tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-702707714463896610.post2031920181064881609..comments2023-10-15T04:49:04.164-07:00Comments on Christine's Contemplations: Weekend 10Christinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07869965986083175599noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-702707714463896610.post-15881565426615954102015-01-27T08:05:37.384-08:002015-01-27T08:05:37.384-08:00Thank you for your comment INTeJer. If you're...Thank you for your comment INTeJer. If you're really interested in seeing my photographs, I post my non-family photos on my exposure page and my portfolio.<br /><br />christineestelle.zenfolio.com and https://christineestelle.exposure.co/<br /><br />My issue with that flower photo wasn't that one was in focus and others weren't, it was that none of them were in focus. I do know how to increase and decrease my depth of field. Christinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07869965986083175599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-702707714463896610.post-33964579991010690192015-01-26T15:52:33.388-08:002015-01-26T15:52:33.388-08:00on a whim i clicked "next blog" in the b...on a whim i clicked "next blog" in the bar at the top... found another photographer! :)<br /><br />i liked your photos. you said the flower ones weren't good but i say they are. =P <br /><br />the shot of the purple ones: i wouldn't even <i>want</i> all of them in focus, if it were me. shallow depth-of-field is something to strive for in many cases, not to lament!<br /><br />if you do try again, contemplating a way to bring more of the flowers into focus, just increase your aperture value-- not much, just one or two notches. also try to focus on the closest flower you want to see sharply; the depth-of-field begins at the point of focus, and extends away from you beyond that point.<br /><br />sorry if i'm saying stuff you already know. looking forward to more of your work/art/artwork!INTeJerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18303521696892852393noreply@blogger.com